VICTOR KIANI
  • About
  • Experience
  • Education
  • Contact

Self-Authored·U.S. Marine Corps·2022

The Manual Nobody Asked For

Twenty pages of indirect-fire doctrine, condensed into a teaching reference a Marine would actually sit down with. No one ordered it. It just needed to exist.

MOS
0341 Mortarman
Billet
Forward Observer
Unit
Weapons Co., 2d Bn, 25th Marines

In this case study

Scenario·Approach·Assets·Call for fire·Direction·Translation·Takeaway

Scenario

Doctrine exists. Getting a Marine to sit down with it is another story.

My MOS was Mortarman (0341). My billet was Forward Observer at Weapons Company, 2d Battalion, 25th Marines. The Marine on the ground responsible for locating targets and calling for fire from supporting arms. I had just completed the Basic Forward Observation Course through the Marine Corps Institute (MCI) and the Joint Fires course through Joint Knowledge Online (JKO). The procedures were fresh; the source materials were not.

Fire-support doctrine is scattered across field manuals, MCI modules, and JKO coursework: hundreds of pages of dense, reference-style text. Comprehensive. Accurate. Designed to be looked up, not sat down with.

A Marine will read 20 pages. They won't read 400.

The stakes are real. Using the wrong asset at the wrong range costs lives when it eventually matters. But nobody sits down with the primary sources voluntarily. Formal training pushes the material at you once; retention is expected by osmosis.

Drawing primarily on the Basic Forward Observation Procedures MCI, I wrote a condensed reference: something peers could teach from, and something I could use to keep the material sharp. No one asked me to.

Approach

Restructure around the decision, not the subject

Most doctrine is organized by topic: one chapter per asset, one per procedure. I reorganized around the decision a Marine has to make, in sequence.

  1. +

    Which asset fits this target?

    Compare trajectory, rate of fire, range, and effect across the four main indirect-fire systems.

  2. +

    Who do I call to get it?

    Understand the fire-support team (Forward Observer, Fire Direction Center, Fire Support Coordinator) and the order in which they sequence.

  3. +

    How do I describe the target?

    Choose a direction method (OT Line, GT Line, Cardinal, Arbitrary Reference) based on your position and the observer's mobility.

  4. +

    What effect do I want?

    Pick between destruction, neutralization, and suppression. Each has different ammunition cost, casualty thresholds, and frequency of use.

The document closes with two fully worked tactical examples: a ground-observer polar mission and an aerial-observer scenario. I built them from commercial satellite imagery of active positions in Ukraine, pulled through Global Enhanced GEOINT Delivery (G-EGD), NGA's imagery distribution platform. Junior Marines learning to call for fire absorb more from current, real terrain than from abstract training aids. That judgment drove the choice. GEOINT data and distribution-restricted identifiers were redacted per caveat requirements.

Assets

Four systems, one decision

The first decision in any fire mission: which asset best fits the target? Each system trades range for rate of fire, precision for coverage, trajectory for terrain tolerance.

Mortars

Light artillery

Trajectory

High

Rate of fire

Up to 20 rounds per minute

Range

Short, must stay near the forward line of troops

Best for

Entrenched or dug-in targets · Reverse-slope positions · Uneven terrain

Howitzers

M777 · 155mm · Medium artillery

Trajectory

Medium, can fire high like a mortar or flat like naval gunfire

Rate of fire

2–3 rounds per minute · massed-fires principle

Range

Medium

Best for

Armored targets · Hardened structures · Dismounted infantry · GPS-precision strikes

Naval gunfire

5-inch / 54 cal · DD-51 · CG-47

Trajectory

Flat, high muzzle velocity

Rate of fire

Up to 20 rounds per minute · 600 rounds per gun onboard

Range

Long · ship-dependent

Best for

Material targets with vertical faces · Direct or assault fire (care required near friendly troops)

HIMARS

M142 rocket system

Trajectory

Medium to low · range-dependent

Rate of fire

1–6 rockets per pod · minutes to reload

Range

2–300 km depending on munition

Best for

Precision targets · Large troop concentrations · Hardened structures and bunkers

Desired effect

Three ways to define success

  • Destruction

    Threshold

    Target destroyed, or 30%+ casualties

    Cost

    High · precision adjustments and heavy ammunition expenditure

    Frequency

    Rarely fired · must be well-justified

  • Neutralization

    Threshold

    Combat effectiveness disrupted · roughly 10%+ casualties

    Cost

    Low · correct shell/fuze combination

    Frequency

    Most common fire mission

  • Suppression

    Threshold

    Hostile element temporarily stops functioning

    Cost

    Low

    Frequency

    Limited · no lasting effect on most targets

Call for fire

Five transmissions between observer and gun

A call for fire is a scripted exchange. Every line has a purpose: establishing position, warning the supporting arm, committing to the mission, describing the target, closing the loop.

  1. 01

    Position report

    FO → FDC

    FDC // FO — Standby POSREP — OVER.

    Observer provides current and accurate grid position.

  2. 02

    Warning order

    FO → FDC

    FDC // FO — Standby Call for Fire / Adjust Fire — OVER.

    A fire mission is about to commence. Supporting arm goes ready.

  3. 03

    Fire mission

    FO → FDC

    FDC // FO — Adjust Fire Polar — Direction 3644 — Distance 880m — OVER.

    Polar mission: direction in mils plus distance. No target grid required.

  4. 04

    Target & shell/fuze

    FO → FDC

    TARGET description + Shell/Fuze (e.g., half-quick / half-delay) — OVER.

    This is a request. The FSO has final call on how to engage.

  5. 05

    MTO readback

    FDC → FO

    READ BACK THE MTO VERBATIM.

    FDC issues a Message to Observer: firing unit, rounds in adjust, rounds in effect, target number. Repeat it word-for-word.

Direction

Four ways to point at a target

How you describe direction depends on who you are and where you are. A stationary ground observer uses one method; an orbiting drone needs a different one.

OT Line

Observer-Target Line

An imaginary line from the observer, through the target.

Use when

Stationary ground observer with line-of-sight. Most common method for target location and adjustment.

GT Line

Gun-Target Line

An imaginary line from the firing unit, through the target.

Use when

Aerial observer (drone or helicopter). The observer's orientation relative to the target is constantly shifting.

Cardinal

Cardinal / Intercardinal

The eight compass directions (N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW).

Use when

No compass, no map. Least accurate method, used only when precision tools are unavailable.

ARF

Arbitrary Reference Feature

A natural or manmade feature referenced for target location and fire adjustment.

Use when

When transmitting OT Line would compromise the observer's position.

Translation

Knowledge management, with the stakes made literal

Strip away the jargon and this was a content problem: dense reference material, restructured into something a reader would actually open.

Marine Corps context

Civilian equivalent

  • +

    Field manuals that cover everything and teach nothing

    →

    Internal wikis that document everything and onboard no one

  • +

    Formal training that fades after the course ends

    →

    Onboarding that fades by week three

  • +

    Tacit NCO knowledge about which asset to call

    →

    Tribal knowledge about which runbook to reach for

  • +

    A condensed reference a Marine would actually sit down with

    →

    A one-pager a new hire would actually open

The work is the same. The stakes are just quieter.

Takeaway

What the project taught me

  • Rank doesn't gate clarity

    A Lance Corporal writing reference material could seem out of place. But the people closest to how a document actually gets used are often best positioned to improve it. Nobody asked me to write this. The document justified itself.

  • Structure follows decisions, not topics

    Doctrine tends to organize by subject. One chapter per asset, one per procedure. I reorganized around the decision a Marine has to make, in sequence: which asset, who to call, how to describe, what effect. The information didn't change. The order did.

  • Writing for voluntary readers is a skill

    Primary sources earn their bulk by being thorough. They're designed to be looked up, not worked through. If you want people to actually engage with technical material, length and hierarchy matter more than coverage. That discipline transfers directly to any internal document you want opened, not archived.

© 2025 VICTOR KIANI